Application of the theoretical cycles (part second)
Fit conditions for the attack:
As it results underlined on the preceding chart, in 30 hits they are had in theory, 9.36 repetitions, such figure has been rounded off to 9 for computational simplicity.
30 hits are the point of departure of the technique in matter.
It results evident that we remain other 7 hits to be able to attach before the end of the rotation.
Now, knowing that the real repetitions follow more faithfully the theoretical values, we will have to have a po of patience and constancy to find a discard between the theoretical condition and that real.
In practice it won't be had to play until the strength number of the repetitions, at the end of the first 30 hits it is of 9.
this because any discard doesn't exist still.
It won't be had to begin to aim until when a discard won't manifest him than at least 3 points.
this discard nevertheless it needs to consider him/it in the two senses:
- until a delay or a lack than at least 3 repetitions it is recorded after the phase of observation of 30 hits.
- when the number of the repetitions is in leftover of 3 on the theoretical line.
You will play instead when a discard will be formed than at least 3 points between the real real number and the theoretical number of the repetitions of the numbers.
If the patience will be had to observe a delay or a leftover of repetitions on the theoretical division, it will certainly have a lot of occasions of win.
Definition of the attack:
The attack to the real game is a sort of speculation balanced on the return to the eHERElibrium in the 7 following hits gotten her/it of the 30° hit.
At that time the player will have available two well precise choices:
| To |
| If the number of the repetitions is late in relationship to the theorist, the win will be sought after with the apparition of the lacking repetitions, that is it will need to aim the gotten numbers an only time in the phase of observation.
|
| B |
| In the case there were too repetitions, then the win will be dictated by the absent numbers in the phase of observation.
|
Following 3 meaningful examples will be proposed for better understanding the discourse.
First example of application:
| N° of the hits |
Perm. |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
1 |
|
1 |
X |
2 |
|
3 |
|
| 2 |
21 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
| 3 |
17 |
|
7 |
X |
8 |
|
9 |
X |
| 4 |
14 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
X |
12 |
X |
| 5 |
9 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
X |
15 |
XXX |
| 6 |
31 |
|
16 |
XX |
17 |
XXX |
18 |
X |
| 7 |
25 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
XXX |
| 8 |
18 |
|
22 |
XX |
23 |
|
24 |
X |
| 9 |
22 |
|
25 |
X |
26 |
|
27 |
X |
| 10 |
12 |
|
28 |
X |
29 |
X |
30 |
|
| 11 |
24 |
|
31 |
X |
32 |
|
33 |
X |
| 12 |
17 |
|
34 |
XX |
35 |
|
36 |
X |
| 13 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is the situation of the picture after the first 30 hits.
The mathematical proposition is fully respected.
In effects on 21 numbers 9 are occurred
repetitions, therefore it is not possible to aim.
According to example of application:
| N°dei hits |
Perm. |
|
|
|
0 |
X |
|
|
| 1 |
34 |
|
1 |
X |
2 |
|
3 |
|
| 2 |
20 |
|
4 |
X |
5 |
XX |
6 |
X |
| 3 |
10 |
|
7 |
XX |
8 |
X |
9 |
|
| 4 |
23 |
|
10 |
X |
11 |
|
12 |
|
| 5 |
34 |
|
13 |
XX |
14 |
XX |
15 |
|
| 6 |
0 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
| 7 |
5 |
|
19 |
X |
20 |
X |
21 |
X |
| 8 |
21 |
|
22 |
X |
23 |
X |
24 |
|
| 9 |
29 |
|
25 |
XX |
26 |
X |
27 |
|
| 10 |
6 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
X |
30 |
X |
| 11 |
31 |
|
31 |
XX |
32 |
X |
33 |
|
| 12 |
1 |
|
34 |
XX |
35 |
|
36 |
XX |
| 13 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this example an opportunity of game is glimpse.
In fact there are 6 repetitions, therefore a discard
of 3 in relationship to gets her/it theoretical. Bringing himself/herself/itself to the preceding chapter the point Á. stipulates that if the
number of the repetitions is late in comparison to the theory, the gotten numbers will aim him an alone
turns in the phase of observation.
In the case in examination they are the numbers 0/1/4//6/8/10/13/19/20/21/22/23/26/29/30/32/34 and you/they must be played
to the 31° hit, joining them where as horses it is possible.
It goes out 4, therefore 18 unities are won.
The game continues with the other 17 numbers since he is still under the ideal conditions of game.
In effects after 31 hits 7 repetitions are had for one gotten theoretical of 10.
I discard him/it of 3 it is conforming
to the speculative conditions of attack.
They still aims 17 unities and to 32° hit with gets her/it of 13 other 19 unities they are earned.
In this moment it is convenient to interrupt the attack since the number of the repetitions not
it exhibits that a delay of 2 repetitions on the theory (8 against 10).
continuta-->